using labels or pvc #218
-
|
Why should I use labels instead of the kubernetic way pvc. Is the sole reason simplicity? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Hi, we introduced labels for two reasons: 1) It makes pod declarations simpler; and 2) It enables different uses of datasets e.g. as environment variables, instead of mounting alone. You can use the PVC, if you prefer. But, in a future update, datashim may not generate PVCs with names same as datasets to cater for different use-cases e.g. a dataset that encompasses multiple data sources. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I see, ok I will use labels for future compatibility. Thank you for the heads up. But wouldint |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You're welcome! We are exploring annotations but so far we do not have a clear idea of their advantages over labels for datasets. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi, we introduced labels for two reasons: 1) It makes pod declarations simpler; and 2) It enables different uses of datasets e.g. as environment variables, instead of mounting alone. You can use the PVC, if you prefer. But, in a future update, datashim may not generate PVCs with names same as datasets to cater for different use-cases e.g. a dataset that encompasses multiple data sources.