Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lesson Contribution - Two suggestions on Episode 3 and 4 #72

Open
Talishask opened this issue Feb 24, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Lesson Contribution - Two suggestions on Episode 3 and 4 #72

Talishask opened this issue Feb 24, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Talishask
Copy link

I'm a member of The Carpentries Core Team and I'm submitting this issue on behalf of another member of the community. In most cases, I won't be able to follow up or provide more details other than what I'm providing below.

On https://datacarpentry.org/organization-geospatial/04-geo-landscape/index.html
My comment is that the addition of the software package ENVI by L3Harris is widely used for Remote Sensing and should be included. It is heavily used in the community.

The other comment is very minor but on https://datacarpentry.org/organization-geospatial/03-crs/index.html

It would be helpful to distinguish the difference between a geographic coordinate system and the projected systems. It comes up, especially when dealing with measurements and distance.

@srappel
Copy link
Member

srappel commented Feb 28, 2022

These both seem sensible.

@jhollist should we bring these up at the CAC meeting?

Any maintainers have thoughts on these?

@jsta
Copy link
Member

jsta commented Feb 28, 2022

My slight preference would be to not list any commercial software.

@srappel
Copy link
Member

srappel commented Feb 28, 2022

@jsta There is a whole section on the page for commercial software. I think it's worth a discussion on how exhaustive the "landscape" list is and what makes something worth listing.

@jhollist
Copy link

@srappel all of these are certainly a good fit for the CAC. Projections, CRS, etc. will definitely be a topic given all the changes the PROJ and the supporting geospatial packages.

@misgna3
Copy link

misgna3 commented Jun 22, 2022

Both suggestions are acceptable. In fact, categorizing the list into software that are GIS emphasis (such as ArcGIS, QGIS, Manifold) & Remote sensing or image analysis emphasis (such as ERDAS, ENVI, IDRISI) or adding notes to that effect may be a good idea.

@misgna3 misgna3 self-assigned this Jun 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants