Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Value update or deletion doesn't work for properties of other ontology (DEV-1367) #2222

Conversation

irinaschubert
Copy link

@irinaschubert irinaschubert commented Sep 27, 2022

Issue Number: DEV-1367

Pull Request Checklist

Basic Requirements

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix: represents bug fixes
  • Refactor: represents production code refactoring
  • Feature: represents a new feature
  • Documentation: documentation changes (no production code change)
  • Chore: maintenance tasks (no production code change)
  • Style: styles updates (no production code change)
  • Test: all about tests: adding, refactoring tests (no production code change)
  • Other... Please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Does this PR change client-test-data?

  • Yes (don't forget to update the JS-LIB team about the change)
  • No

Other information

@swarmia
Copy link

swarmia bot commented Sep 27, 2022

@irinaschubert irinaschubert self-assigned this Sep 27, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 86.64% // Head: 86.86% // Increases project coverage by +0.22% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (3f3e5cc) compared to base (71c772f).
Patch coverage: 84.68% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2222      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.64%   86.86%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         233      241       +8     
  Lines       28020    27974      -46     
==========================================
+ Hits        24277    24299      +22     
+ Misses       3743     3675      -68     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...sp-shared/src/main/scala/dsp/valueobjects/V2.scala 84.05% <0.00%> (-1.45%) ⬇️
webapi/src/main/scala/org/knora/webapi/Main.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...n/responder/groupsmessages/GroupsMessagesADM.scala 73.33% <ø> (ø)
...sponder/projectsmessages/ProjectsMessagesADM.scala 91.19% <ø> (ø)
...tore/triplestoremessages/TriplestoreMessages.scala 74.78% <ø> (-0.22%) ⬇️
...webapi/messages/util/ConstructResponseUtilV2.scala 93.29% <ø> (ø)
...a/org/knora/webapi/messages/util/MessageUtil.scala 36.66% <ø> (ø)
...knora/webapi/messages/util/PermissionUtilADM.scala 84.54% <ø> (ø)
...vsearch/types/GravsearchTypeInspectionRunner.scala 100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../webapi/messages/v2/responder/KnoraRequestV2.scala 0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 144 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@irinaschubert irinaschubert marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2022 09:24
Copy link
Collaborator

@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I made two cosmetic remarks, but I don't think they warrant waiting for another test run to pass, so feel free to ignore them.

@irinaschubert irinaschubert merged commit 472b375 into main Sep 29, 2022
@irinaschubert irinaschubert deleted the wip/dev-1367-value-update-doesnt-work-for-properties-of-other-ontology branch September 29, 2022 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants