Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: add archive representation to DSP-API (DEV-17) #1926

Merged
merged 61 commits into from Nov 25, 2021

Conversation

BalduinLandolt
Copy link
Collaborator

resolves DEV-17

@subotic subotic assigned subotic and BalduinLandolt and unassigned subotic Nov 3, 2021
@BalduinLandolt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

as discussed, further improvements to the file models should be done in a next PR

@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt requested review from irinaschubert, subotic and mpro7 and removed request for mpro7 November 25, 2021 15:04
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 25, 2021

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 2 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@subotic subotic changed the title feat: add bundle representation to DSP-API (DEV-17) feat: add archive representation to DSP-API (DEV-17) Nov 25, 2021
@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt dismissed mpro7’s stale review November 25, 2021 19:02

All requested changes have been addressed.

@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt changed the title feat: add archive representation to DSP-API (DEV-17) feat!: add archive representation to DSP-API (DEV-17) Nov 25, 2021
@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt merged commit 0123a8f into main Nov 25, 2021
@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt deleted the wip/DEV-17-bundle-representation branch November 25, 2021 19:06
@daschbot daschbot mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants