Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

thread 'main' has overflowed its stack #97

Open
mlr11 opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

thread 'main' has overflowed its stack #97

mlr11 opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@mlr11
Copy link

mlr11 commented May 9, 2024

The piece of verilog code below is causing the parser to exit with:

thread 'main' has overflowed its stack.

I tried increasing the stack up to 64M without any luck.

The somewhat convoluted expression is giving a tough time to the parser.

module test (
    input wire clk,
    input wire reset,
    input wire lcomreq,
    input wire lmask1,
    input wire lmask0,
    input wire req3,
    input wire req2,
    input wire req1,
    input wire req0,
    output reg lgnt0
);

always @(posedge clk or posedge reset) begin
    if (reset) begin
        lgnt0 <= 1'b0;
    end else begin
        lgnt0 <= (~lcomreq & ~lmask1 & ~lmask0 & ~req3 & ~req2 & ~req1 & req0)
               | (~lcomreq & ~lmask1 &  lmask0 & ~req3 & ~req2 &  req0)
               | (~lcomreq &  lmask1 & ~lmask0 & ~req3 &  req0)
               | (~lcomreq &  lmask1 &  lmask0 & req0  )
               | ( lcomreq & lgnt0 );
    end
end

endmodule

Everything works as expected if I refactor the code and create intermediate terms for each part of the 'or'
The always block would look like:

always @(posedge clk or posedge reset) begin
    if (reset) begin
        lgnt0 <= 1'b0;
    end else begin
        lgnt0 <= term1 | term2 | term3 | term4 | term5;
    end
end

with wire assignment for each of the terms.

@mlr11
Copy link
Author

mlr11 commented May 27, 2024

sv_parser might not be the culprit here. I kept getting this error for the majority of the verilog designs I was trying to use.
Even some of the passing examples from the sv-test suite were failing with the same message.

I tried switching from Windows to Linux (WSL - Ubuntu 22.04) and all of my problems went away.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant