You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When you have a lot of matrices, all the plotting region is filled by the legend bar. I suggest going back to using image() [since I never found a way to remove the legend bar in lattice]. And I don't like color.
Also, I liked the name communityPGLMM.plot.re as shorter. In fact, we could even shorten communityPGLMM to comPGLMM. That might be a nice way to distinguish it form the version in pez. Right now, the new version is pretty different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Tony,
To suppress the legend bar, set colorkey = FALSE. The nice thing about lattice and ggplot2 is that it will be so much easier to combine and custom plots later... In terms of color, I think you can use col.regions argument to use your own color scheme.
I can change the function name to communityPGLMM.plot.re.
The main reason I still used communityPGLMM is to be able to be compatible with pez. If we decide to short the name, I would go further and use something like cPGLMM or just PGLMM.
@arives now both communityPGLMM.plot.re and communityPGLMM.show.re available in phyr. plot.communityPGLMM will plot observed values, and optionally predicted values (predicted = FALSE by default).
When you have a lot of matrices, all the plotting region is filled by the legend bar. I suggest going back to using image() [since I never found a way to remove the legend bar in lattice]. And I don't like color.
Also, I liked the name communityPGLMM.plot.re as shorter. In fact, we could even shorten communityPGLMM to comPGLMM. That might be a nice way to distinguish it form the version in pez. Right now, the new version is pretty different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: