Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I voted yes for a web version ! Very nice work btw |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
CoreFreq GUI is a basic GUI sample. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is it worth programming a Graphical UI for CoreFreq ?
Contributions for UI designed will be welcomed.
Pros & Cons:
+
Sensors history charts are easier to program.+
Point & click makes CoreFreq easier to use.+
Offloading drawing cycles to GPU may improve CPU monitoring accuracy.+
Brings UI to other OS and/or web browsers.+
In data centers, ability to manage multiple CoreFreq-
Web-socket and JSON Server CPU overhead could impact monitoring-
Some features may become available only in one environment, GUI vs TUI-
Network connected UI is adding security risks-
Currently, SSH access tocorefreq-cli
is more than enough3 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions