Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping of variables to standardnames #21

Open
MartineDeVos opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Mapping of variables to standardnames #21

MartineDeVos opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@MartineDeVos
Copy link

eWatercycle II: When used for model coupling, BMI expects variable names of the corresponding models to be mapped to standard names. In practice, modelers are not using these standard names and refer to the original variable names. Is the mapping of variables desirable? If not, how could model coupling, i.e., selecting the right variables, be supported otherwise.

Instead of mapping variable names, we could annotate variables with metadata that specifies the context and meaning of the variable.

@MartineDeVos MartineDeVos changed the title Mpping of variables to standardnames Mapping of variables to standardnames Nov 16, 2018
@peckhams
Copy link

peckhams commented Nov 20, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants