Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate and remove device mapper storage driver #7002

Open
kolyshkin opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #8019
Open

Deprecate and remove device mapper storage driver #7002

kolyshkin opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #8019
Assignees
Labels
kind/deprecation lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@kolyshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

kolyshkin commented May 31, 2023

It seems that no one is using devicemapper storage driver nowadays, since overlayfs is so much better.

Can it be deprecated and removed? I see that moby/moby did that recently.

See also: containers/storage#1619

@kolyshkin kolyshkin added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label May 31, 2023
@haircommander
Copy link
Member

+1 from me, but we should have a slower deprecation process. 1.28, we can warn the user if they're using devmapper and mark as deprecated, and 1.29 we can drop support

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2023

A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 2, 2023
@saschagrunert saschagrunert added kind/deprecation and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Sep 6, 2023
@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title RFC: deprecate/remove device mapper storage driver Deprecate and remove device mapper storage driver Sep 6, 2023
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

+1 from my side, putting it into the project board

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2023

A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 7, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2024

Closing this issue since it had no activity in the past 90 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jan 5, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 5, 2024
@haircommander haircommander removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. labels Jan 5, 2024
@kolyshkin kolyshkin linked a pull request Apr 15, 2024 that will close this issue
@kolyshkin kolyshkin reopened this Apr 15, 2024
Copy link

A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/deprecation lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
Status: To do
3 participants