Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can this solver solve problems on non-cartesian mesh? #25

Open
2012ZGZYY opened this issue Apr 8, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Can this solver solve problems on non-cartesian mesh? #25

2012ZGZYY opened this issue Apr 8, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@2012ZGZYY
Copy link

2012ZGZYY commented Apr 8, 2018

I tested with the naca0012 mesh but found the solution not satisfactory. Is it because this code can not apply to non-cartesian mesh yet ? If I want to add this feature, which part of the code should I modify?

@2012ZGZYY 2012ZGZYY changed the title can this solver solve problems on unstructured mesh? Can this solver solve problems on non-cartesian mesh? Apr 8, 2018
@cpraveen
Copy link
Owner

cpraveen commented Apr 9, 2018

DG requires high order meshes atleast on curved boundaries. I.e., one has to use isoparametric elements. For general shapes like airfoils, this is not so easy. If you have an equation of boundary like y = f(x), then you can implement curved boundary by projecting the boundary edge onto the true boundary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants