Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 7, 2022. It is now read-only.

consider treating FUID in same way as PHONE #32

Open
bodik opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

consider treating FUID in same way as PHONE #32

bodik opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Security
Projects
Backend Frontend
Milestone
MVP

Comments

@bodik
Copy link

bodik commented Mar 20, 2020

consider treating FUID in same way as PHONE

refs:
@jendakol jendakol added this to the MVP milestone Mar 20, 2020
@jendakol jendakol added this to To Do in Backend via automation Mar 20, 2020
@jendakol jendakol added enhancement New feature or request Security labels Mar 20, 2020
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Mar 20, 2020

FUID is not PI, by design.

@jendakol
Copy link
Collaborator

jendakol commented Mar 20, 2020 •
edited

@Kobzol I agree, but still - isn't it better to keep the API consistent?

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Mar 20, 2020

Sure, good point.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Security
Projects
Backend
  
To Do
Frontend
Awaiting triage
Milestone
MVP
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@bodik @jendakol @Kobzol