Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need states and process in RFC process #14

Open
ingenthr opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Need states and process in RFC process #14

ingenthr opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@ingenthr
Copy link
Contributor

Process in Github and States

Identified >> Draft >> Review >> Accepted

Goal: use github commenting as a way to receive feedback from everyone prior to ACCEPTED.

Identified: Open an issue

Draft: Put together a branch of your own, edit away, when ready for core team review, send pull request and add to README. Core team comments. When ready for stakeholder review, send out something to circulate, no status change. Stakeholders must add their parts before it goes to REVIEW state.

Review: Update the doc to indicate REVIEW status, update the README to indicate status, and ensure it points to the correct pull request. Set an expiration of a minimum of 1 week, no maximum.

Accepted: Merge into RFCs. Further feedback should be handled by github issues.

@daschl
Copy link
Contributor

daschl commented Jan 13, 2016

So this actually breaks down into:

  • Adding explicit states to the rfc process
  • Changing the rfc process to the proposed approach here
  • Add the concept of an errata and add information that once an rfc is accepted it is not changed, but changes are appended in the errata.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants