Skip to content

Is *terminal good image protocol* abandoned? #544

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hey @timsofteng.

Many thanks for bringing this up, and I apologize for the severe lag of contributions and communications on this end for quite some time now. This is primarily due to my personal life's situation and the pending bigger-sized PRs I want to stabelized and finished (i.e. merged) before concentrating on the Good Image Protocol again). So this is certainly not dead from my end.

I also just released 0.2.3 of contour and the next one (0.3.0) will contain my big PR (#342) merge as I'm close to feeling confident having this one stabilized enough to be merged to master (tm). :)

Replies: 4 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by christianparpart
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #543 on December 13, 2021 23:08.