Fonts! [Deadline: March 15]

[ebullient]

Proposal

Shorter turnaround on this one.

Important

View the details: Round 5 fonts

Voting group

@commonhaus/founders

Consensus mechanism

Rank them in order of preference.

• (🚀, optional) Specific number if you have a favorite
• (👎, optional) Specific number if it is an absolute no

Constructive commentary is helpful.

Vote counting instructions

[haus-rules-bot[bot]]

✅ 9 of 9 members of @commonhaus/founders have voted (comment).

The following members have commented:
aalmiray, cealsair, ebullient, evanchooly, gavinking, kenfinnigan, maxandersen, nmcl, yrodiere

[aalmiray]

1 🚀 easier to read
2 👍 different but takes 1 extra nanosecond to read
3 👍 perhaps 1 or 2 pixels smaller?
4 👎
5 👎
6 👎
7 👎

4 to 7 meesa no likey

[ebullient]

I'm with you, Andres. Same order, too.

[sigrunixia]

In order:
1 🚀
3 🚀
6 👍
2 👍
4 👎
5 👎
7 👎

[cowtowncoder]

In order:
7 🚀
1 👍
6👍
2
5
3
4

[yrodiere]

3 🚀
1 👍
2 👎
4 👎
6 👎
7 👎
5 👎

[kenfinnigan]

1 🚀
3
7
4
2
5 👎
6 👎

[gavinking]

4
2
1
3
5 👎
6 👎
7 👎

[nmcl]

1, 7, 3, 4, 5, 2, 6

[cealsair]

In order of preference from most preferred to least preferred:

• 7
• 2
• 6
• 5
• 4
• 1
• 3

[evanchooly]

7
6 ( just less heavy than the others )
1
3
2 💩 (moar kerning!)
4 💩
5 💩

All of them would "work," though. But I will (not so?) silently judge choices of 2, 4, or 5.

[maxandersen]

2,3,1,7,6,5,4

[ebullient]

Quorum again! Well done, everyone, and thank you!