Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to use CloudinaryField to accept images/url from other sources? #233

Open
abkiran opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

How to use CloudinaryField to accept images/url from other sources? #233

abkiran opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@abkiran
Copy link

abkiran commented Feb 25, 2020

I used Django package cloudinary==1.19.1

models.py

class Category(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
    url = models.CharField(max_length=255)
    image = CloudinaryField(null=True)
    image_source=models.CharField()

I want to use the image field to accept images that uploaded from admin, also some of my background tasks add the image URLs to that field depends on the image_source.

Possible image sources are: Google, Facebook, cloudinary or CloudFront

For example: When the image source is from google, I just want to save the complete image URL() instead of uploading the actual image to cloudinary and saving the id

How do I achieve this?

@brian-cloudinary @const-cloudinary @cloudinary @CloudinaryLtd

@lukitsbrian lukitsbrian self-assigned this Feb 26, 2020
@lukitsbrian
Copy link
Contributor

@abkiran Are you running into an issue with your current implementation? It seems like what you have should work since you have a url field and a nullable image field for Cloudinary images.

@abkiran
Copy link
Author

abkiran commented Feb 27, 2020

@brian-cloudinary
url field is to store the auto generated slug,

My question was can I store the image URL of different source in to the image field

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants