You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your GitHub Action! I just tested in one of my repositories, cffreference, and also added it to the CITATION.cff of the repository.
Thereby, the question which is the subject of this issue occurred.
The tool cffreference is designed to extract the citation information of a given input CITATION.cff in order to append them to an output CITATION.cff. The application has also a preview mode for showing the lines which would be added in the own references section. I already suggested the tool in the main repository of the CFF project.
When running it over your CITATION.cff, I was unsure whether the word conceptdoi in line 21 was chosen intentionally. I cited your repository with exactly this spelling but I would like to let you know that this unusual spelling of "concept DOI" might cause unintended confusion and could, hence, require some extra documentation in a future release in order to reason this design choice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear maintainers,
Thank you for your GitHub Action! I just tested in one of my repositories,
cffreference
, and also added it to theCITATION.cff
of the repository.Thereby, the question which is the subject of this issue occurred.
The tool
cffreference
is designed to extract the citation information of a given inputCITATION.cff
in order to append them to an outputCITATION.cff
. The application has also a preview mode for showing the lines which would be added in the ownreferences
section. I already suggested the tool in the main repository of the CFF project.When running it over your
CITATION.cff
, I was unsure whether the word conceptdoi in line 21 was chosen intentionally. I cited your repository with exactly this spelling but I would like to let you know that this unusual spelling of "concept DOI" might cause unintended confusion and could, hence, require some extra documentation in a future release in order to reason this design choice.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: