Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The result when setting L_s as non-zero? #10

Open
yangxh11 opened this issue Mar 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

The result when setting L_s as non-zero? #10

yangxh11 opened this issue Mar 23, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@yangxh11
Copy link

yangxh11 commented Mar 23, 2022

I have noticed that in your paper, the L_s is set as 0. It is consistent with the code:
def _select_loss(self, selected_logits, labels): loss1 = 0

But I am curious about the experiment result of a non-zero L_s. Does the accuracy decrease evidently?

@chou141253
Copy link
Owner

In our experiments, using GCN combiner and L_s at the same time may cause unstable training. We would take more experiments on this, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants