Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cgeo on devices without GPS #5980

Closed
samueltardieu opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

cgeo on devices without GPS #5980

samueltardieu opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Feedback required Issue requires feedback of the author or another user
Milestone

Comments

@samueltardieu
Copy link
Member

Starting October 15th, application with no explicit android.hardware.location.gps use in the manifest and requiring high precision location will be able to get installed on devices without a GPS.

It means that cgeo will be installable on devices where only network-derived location is available. Do we want this, or do we want to restrict (as I believe it is right now) cgeo to platforms with a GPS to ensure a good user experience?

@samueltardieu samueltardieu added the Feedback required Issue requires feedback of the author or another user label Sep 20, 2016
@Lineflyer
Copy link
Member

AFAIR we had this discussion in the past already where we introduced the explicit requirement.

From the support point of view I strongly vote for limiting the availability to GPS enabled devices due to:

  1. In the past we always had users on support claiming c:geo not working, where it finally turned out, that the device did not have GPS. In addition we had quite a bunch of bad ratings on Google Play due to this. This has stopped finally after the change.
  2. Now we have from time to time some users writing us, that they still want c:geo although they are aware that their device does not have GPS. I do link them to our direct APK download. Those users are aware of what they are doing.

@mucek4
Copy link
Member

mucek4 commented Sep 20, 2016

+1 to lineflyer's comment

@samueltardieu
Copy link
Member Author

+1 to lineflyer's comment

Not using "reactions" is so 2015 :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feedback required Issue requires feedback of the author or another user
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants