Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use pebble for all/more of our tests requiring an ACME server? #6305

Closed
bmw opened this issue Aug 16, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Use pebble for all/more of our tests requiring an ACME server? #6305

bmw opened this issue Aug 16, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@bmw
Copy link
Member

bmw commented Aug 16, 2018

This isn't a high priority for us, but @jsha, when you get the time, I'd love to hear your recommendation here. The main benefit for us is pebbles are more lightweight than boulders.

cc @joohoi

@jsha
Copy link
Contributor

jsha commented Aug 16, 2018

I think that's probably a reasonable approach now, especially since ACME is all-but-done. When we were revving the ACME protocol support in Boulder frequently it made more sense to verify there was a close match between Boulder and Certbot, but now I think Pebble is sufficient (and testing is what it's for!).

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 8, 2019

We've made a lot of changes to Certbot since this issue was opened. If you still have this issue with an up-to-date version of Certbot, can you please add a comment letting us know? This helps us to better see what issues are still affecting our users. If there is no further activity, this issue will be automatically closed.

@stale stale bot added the needs-update label Jun 8, 2019
@adferrand
Copy link
Collaborator

And now Pebble is used instead of Boulder during PRs integration tests. I think we can close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants