Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dependency pinning on APT29 Adversary Emulation Scenario 1 #78

Open
Kaenbyo opened this issue Apr 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Dependency pinning on APT29 Adversary Emulation Scenario 1 #78

Kaenbyo opened this issue Apr 20, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Kaenbyo
Copy link

Kaenbyo commented Apr 20, 2021

Hello there,

I'm currently trying to reproduce the APT29 Scenario 1 in local and noticed that the dependencies on the attacker platform (192.168.0.4) aren't pinned.

This is quite troublesome as this doesn't allow to ensure that the environment is identical to the one expected here.
As a result, at the time of writing, the step to start Pupy doesn't work as start-compose.sh was removed last month.

Is there any plans to do something about it?

Best regards

@leonardogavaudan
Copy link

Hi, these worked for me:


aiohttp-jinja2==1.4.2
aiohttp==3.6.3
aiohttp_session==2.9.0
aiohttp-security==0.4.0
jinja2==2.11.2
pyyaml>=5.1
cryptography==3.3.2
aioconsole==0.1.14
termcolor==1.1.0
pyfiglet==0.8.post1
websockets==8.1
Sphinx==3.5.2
sphinx_rtd_theme==0.5.1
recommonmark==0.7.1

Although I'd recommend looking caldera's new plugin emu that incorporates apt29 attacks released with caldera version 3.0.0 and compatible with 3.1.1

https://github.com/mitre/emu/tree/daed57eb3c611515cc44925b393be7a2f556a965

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants