Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it a dual license? #67

Open
vitaly-krugl opened this issue May 12, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

Is it a dual license? #67

vitaly-krugl opened this issue May 12, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@vitaly-krugl
Copy link

Hi @ask, I would like to use this package, but the license situation is a bit confusing:

The repo contains two licenses:

  1. LICENSE-GPL-2.0
  2. LICENSE-MPL-RabbitMQ

However, both README.rst and PyPi https://pypi.python.org/pypi/librabbitmq#license both make it seem like it's a single MPL license:

This software is licensed under the Mozilla Public License. See the LICENSE-MPL-RabbitMQ file in the top distribution directory for the full license text.

Could you possibly clarify the licensing terms as soon as possible? The MPL license is not compatible with my app, while GPL-2.0 would be compatible.

Many thanks,
Vitaly

@ask
Copy link
Contributor

ask commented May 13, 2015

Hey Vitaly

The license was the same as for rabbitmq-c, which ummm, seems to be MIT licensed now.

Since the distribution includes rabbitmq-c I chose the same dual licensing to be compatible, but if you can help me verify that they have changed to MIT we can change also.

@rhyolight
Copy link

@ask I've found the commits in rabbitmq-c that evidences the license change from GPLv2.0 to MIT on April 12, 2012:

/cc @vitaly-krugl

@vitaly-krugl
Copy link
Author

Thanks @rhyolight! @ask, I asked my colleague @rhyolight to look into this for us. I hope his comment helps clear things up. Best.

@todofixthis
Copy link

todofixthis commented Oct 2, 2017

Any chance, did this issue get resolved? We are performing an audit of all the OSS that we are using at our company; I'm a bit confused as to what I should put in the Licence column next to librabbitmq in our spreadsheet 🤔

@auvipy
Copy link
Member

auvipy commented Jan 15, 2018

issue is resolved i guess

@auvipy auvipy closed this as completed Jan 15, 2018
@hrieke
Copy link

hrieke commented May 31, 2018

This is confusing and needs to be cleaned up.
Can you please update the license properly (and include the updated license information in the headers of the files too? Even better would be to reference this issue in the readme notes!). Thank you.

@rhyolight
Copy link

Yeah I'd say this issue is still open seeing how there are still two licenses. Which one do we use? @ask said there reason it was gpl was because rabbitmq-c was, but that was changed to MIT. If there are two licenses there should be a statement somewhere about how they should be applied.

@thedrow
Copy link
Member

thedrow commented Jun 24, 2018

We should change the license.

@thedrow thedrow reopened this Jun 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants