Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Periodic boundary conditions #1324

Open
Andrew-S-Rosen opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Feature Request: Periodic boundary conditions #1324

Andrew-S-Rosen opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Andrew-S-Rosen
Copy link
Contributor

xTB can be run with both molecular and periodic systems. Right now, the tests are run for the standard molecule systems, meaning we have no way of knowing if things work/break with periodic systems (they almost certainly do). Simple test cases should be added, and the parser updated accordingly.

@Andrew-S-Rosen Andrew-S-Rosen changed the title xTB: Better support of structures with periodic boundary conditions xTB: Better support for structures with periodic boundary conditions Dec 19, 2023
@shivupa shivupa changed the title xTB: Better support for structures with periodic boundary conditions Feature Request: Periodic boundary conditions Jan 8, 2024
@shivupa
Copy link
Contributor

shivupa commented Jan 8, 2024

I'm going to generalize this. I think generalizing cclib to periodic calculations isn't a bad idea and there are other programs cp2k, crystal, quantum package, etc. That will generate data in Gaussian basis sets in periodic settings. (Not that we need to contrain ourselves to Gaussian basis sets).

@ghutchis
Copy link
Contributor

ghutchis commented Jan 8, 2024

IIRC recent versions of Gaussian can run with PBC too

@shivupa
Copy link
Contributor

shivupa commented Jan 8, 2024

oops I forgot you're right

@berquist berquist added this to the v2.0 milestone Jan 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants