You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering if this can be narrowed down to a hypothetical full-node hardware requirements specification and network size handling emulation workloads and memory distributedly, not in full sync, actually capable of providing decentralized "cloud" resources on a Blockchain network.
Since the cost of storing a full Cartesi Machine state within the blockchain is prohibitive, all machine states are represented in the blockchain as cryptographic hashes. The contents of those states and memory represented by those hashes are only known off-chain.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
zdanl
changed the title
Privacy emulation targets on-chain
The prohibitive cost of on-chain Linux instances
May 5, 2024
I was wondering if this can be narrowed down to a hypothetical full-node hardware requirements specification and network size handling emulation workloads and memory distributedly, not in full sync, actually capable of providing decentralized "cloud" resources on a Blockchain network.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: