Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Bug with prediction output since 0.5.4 #69

Open
haoranlee opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[BUG] Bug with prediction output since 0.5.4 #69

haoranlee opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@haoranlee
Copy link

Describe the bug

Predictions at lower levels have strong bias in versions 0.5.6, 0.5.5, and 0.5.4.
Only back to 0.5.3 do plots of predictions look more in line with intuition when compared to true observations.

Example used was this notebook from the examples.

  • Plot for auto-ARIMA model using 0.5.6 (please ignore ordering of subplots):
    example_notebook_0_5_6_plot
  • Plot using 0.5.3:
    example_notebook_0_5_3_plot
  • Plot from the notebook for reference:
    example_notebook_ref_plot

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Replicate this example notebook with scikit-hts>=0.5.4.
  2. Reach the step near the end for plotting the predictions from the auto-ARIMA model (issue persists with Holt Winter’s exponential smoothing also).

Expected behavior

Predictions should not have strong positive or negative biases.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Win 10 Pro
  • scikit-hts version: >=0.5.4
  • Python version: 3.8.3
@haoranlee haoranlee added the bug Something isn't working label May 23, 2021
@PeggyFan
Copy link

I'm interested in this as the forecasts for my sub-group are very poor. The HTS version I'm using is 0.5.11.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants