Make .toPromise attempt to use default Promise constructor

[kirly-af]

Hi,

I don't understand what's stopping .toPromise() to try to use the default Promise constructor if none is passed as argument?
I really think this should be the default behavior.

[vqvu]

Have you seen the discussion in the original PR? #628 (comment) Basically, I was uncomfortable with writing code that implicitly depends on a JS feature that doesn't exist in all execution environments without a proper fallback.

…

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Alexandre ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, I don't understand what's stopping .toPromise() to try to use the default Promise constructor if none is passed as argument? I really think this should be the default behavior. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#647>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGIyZVZVQ-EFWWLjdbNo3OxuMAOBj5u6ks5txb0qgaJpZM4T7u99> .

[kirly-af]

Hi @vqvu, sorry for the late reply.

I understand you avoid default arguments values, though is it still a problem to depend on Promise nowadays? It's standard, widely used and available in most environments.

[vqvu]

IE11 is still a thing, unfortunately :(.

…

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Alexandre ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @vqvu <https://github.com/vqvu>, sorry for the late reply. I understand you avoid default arguments values, though is it still a problem to depend on Promise nowadays? It's standard, widely used and available in most environments. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#647 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGIyZVburVnze8f6bK9oW8u5jhBpQax1ks5t1Rp2gaJpZM4T7u99> .