Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃Ч Move ODS repo outside Cal-ITP #35

Open
2 tasks
e-lo opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
2 tasks

馃Ч Move ODS repo outside Cal-ITP #35

e-lo opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@e-lo
Copy link
Collaborator

e-lo commented Nov 28, 2023

In order to move ODS outside of Cal-ITP, we must create a separate organizational home for it on GitHub which is managed by ODS' own governance processes.

Suggestion:

To do:

@skyqrose
Copy link

skyqrose commented Dec 1, 2023

馃憤 I like the idea of moving it to a separate organization. It originated from Cal-ITP, but it's supposed to be a standard not tied to any one agency.

Feedback on the name:
transit-operations has an almost-conflicting name with https://transitops.co/ , because both have pretty generic names. Maybe the name of the org should have something more specific to what it's doing in the name, like "standards" or "data". Maybe something like "operational-data-standard"? Is it okay if both the org and the main standard are named ODS? Are there other projects planned for this organization such that the name shouldn't be tied to ODS?

@thekaveman
Copy link
Member

thekaveman commented Dec 1, 2023

Maybe something like "operational-data-standard"? Is it okay if both the org and the main standard are named ODS?

I like this idea. The org could be operational-data-standard and the repo spec or similar, then we have:

https://github.com/operational-data-standard/spec as the main GitHub URL.

And the GH Pages URL would default to:

https://operational-data-standard.github.io/spec

Which isn't so bad?? (We can always redirect with a vanity URL too)

@e-lo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

e-lo commented Dec 1, 2023

Two hesitancies on operational-data-standard:

  1. there is no mention of transit
  2. it is very long

@thekaveman
Copy link
Member

there is no mention of transit

Good point

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants