Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not found libs based on x86 in 1.5.10 #751

Open
nanguantong opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Not found libs based on x86 in 1.5.10 #751

nanguantong opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@nanguantong
Copy link

@saudet
Hi, Not found libs based on x86 in 1.5.10. why?

Could not find javacpp-1.5.10-linux-x86.jar (org.bytedeco:javacpp:1.5.10).
Searched in the following locations:
    https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/bytedeco/javacpp/1.5.10/javacpp-1.5.10-linux-x86.jar

Could not find javacpp-1.5.10-windows-x86.jar (org.bytedeco:javacpp:1.5.10).
Searched in the following locations:
    https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/bytedeco/javacpp/1.5.10/javacpp-1.5.10-windows-x86.jar
@saudet
Copy link
Member

saudet commented Apr 2, 2024

I have not heard of any users needing those for years, but if you need then, please let me know

@nanguantong
Copy link
Author

Yeah, not commonly used, only missing x86 libs updated from 1.5.8 to 1.5.10 in our project config, so why not keeping it as it is.

@nanguantong
Copy link
Author

@saudet

Another problem that version GLIBC_2.28' not found (required by /xxx/.javacpp/cache/ffmpeg-6.1.1-1.5.10-linux-x86_64.jar/org/bytedeco/ffmpeg/linux-x86_64/libavutil.so.58)` on ubuntu-18.04 with glibc 2.27.

Could you please build the libs based on glibc 2.27 ?

@saudet
Copy link
Member

saudet commented Apr 4, 2024

Again, if enough people need binaries for old versions of Linux, that's something that will happen, but that's not the case. Not many people need binaries for old versions of Linux.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants