-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding rudimentary support for user scripting #190
Comments
It would be nice, I thought of this in the past, but unlikely to happen at the current pace of development (myself alone). It would require an UI part to configure the scripts and an engine part to trigger them when it's needed; it would expand the scope beyond what it is currently (privacy patches alone) and it is not strictly about privacy but more in the realm of Greasemonkey and the like. I will leave this open for now, but likely will be closed in future as there is no interest to implement it nor maintain the patches needed for it. |
I was thinking of creating a |
@projectextremum that is still an UI to be implemented |
Didn't work or didn't suit you? FYI, bookmarklets can easily be used in two easy ways on mobile Chromium:
or
|
Problem with bookmarklets is that they are still a lot of manual work. |
Two key points:
I am closing this. |
Is your feature request related to privacy?
Perhaps. I hope it would help to modify things on per site basis.
Is there a patch available for this feature somewhere?
don't know, there are webextensions which do that, but not expecting these APIs to work in mobile chrome.
Describe the solution you'd like
Chrome has rudimentary support for
javascript:
URIs. So I think it should be possible to add site-specific bookmarklets that can be automatically executed on a given site.Describe alternatives you've considered
Bookmarklets didnt work for me. One can always copy paste
javascript
URIs but a troublesome thing.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: