New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different junction and cdr3 reported for same annotation in different sections #84
Comments
I'd like to bring a more concrete example up. My input sequence is
The length of the If I run
and compare that output to
The output should be the same. For my sample of 94942 annotations, that is true for 90163 of them. Even for sequences with SHM indels, the cdr3 found by Using
gives better results. I get 94918 cdr3s correct out of 94942 annotations. Still, I don't understand why 24 fail. Of these 24, only 1 had shm indels. Of these 24, the cdr3 identified is in the raw sequence. 23 of the 24 are out of frame. One is not. Why is it not in the vdj_nt string? This makes no sense to me. Could you elaborate and clarify please? Here is an example of one of the oof 24 that fail:
This is the in frame that fails:
Thanks and all the best, |
Another thing I noticed wrong in all these annotations and any of my annotations: In the |
Hi,
I have an annotation where some fields don't match and make sense. My annotation is for an IgG which is productive and has no indels. The 'cdr3_nt' and (trimmed) 'junc_nt' fields match. However, when I use the region lengths reported to get the cdr3 sequence, things do not match. Further, the junction_nt_breakdown field doesn't match the junc_nt field. Shouldn't these different fields match to their respective same fields?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: