-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
CreatePDF_88628600_1 (1).txt
243 lines (190 loc) · 15 KB
/
CreatePDF_88628600_1 (1).txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
Subscribe now
FOCUS: I Am on Tracy Alloway & Joe Weisenthala€™s Great Odd Lots Podcast This AM!:
And I think it went very well indeed:
Tracy Alloway & Joe Weisenthal & Brad DeLong: : Odd Lots: Brad DeLong on the F TX Collapse & the
South Sea Bubble: a€~We're in the aftermath of an extraordinary bubble in cryptocurrencies and the
collapse of FTX is a defining chapter of the industry's turmoil. But what does history tells us
about the cycle of bubbles and busts? Which past manias are the most similar to
what we've just seen? In this episode, we speak with Brad DeLong, an economic historian at the
University of California at Berkeley, who is also the author of the new book, Slouching Towards
Utopia: An Economic History of the Twentieth Century. He explains how the FTX saga shares shocking
similarities with the story of the South Sea Company, a British endeavor that was at the
center of a massive mania of speculation in the early 1700sa€l
MUST-READ: GPT-Chat:
Ben Thompson: AI Homework: a€Tt happened to be Wednesday night when my daughter, in the midst of
preparing for a€oeThe Trial of Napoleona€D for her European history class, asked for help in her
role as Thomas Hobbes, witness for the defense. I put the question to ChatGPT, which had just been
announced by OpenAI a few hours earlier:
Did Thomas Hobbes believe in separation of powers
Yes, Thomas Hobbes believed in the concept of separation of powers. In his book
"Leviathan," Hobbes argued that a strong, centralized government is necessary to
maintain order and prevent conflict in society.
However, he also believed that a single ruler
or group should not have complete control over all aspects of government. Instead, he
advocated for the separation of powers into different branches, with each branch having
specific responsibilities and powers.
Hobbes believed that the legislative branch of government should be responsible for
making laws, the executive branch should be responsible for enforcing laws, and the
judicial branch should be responsible for interpreting laws. This separation of powers
would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful and would help to ensure that
the government acts in the best interests of the people.
Overall, Hobbes' views on separation of powers were influential in the development of
modern systems of government. Many political philosophers and statesmen, including
John Locke and the authors of the United States Constitution, were influenced by his
ideas.
This is a confident answer, complete with supporting evidence and a citation to Hobbes work, and it
is completely wronga€!. It was dumb luck that my first ChatGPT query ended up being something the
service got wrong, but you can see how it might have happened: Hobbes and Locke are almost always
mentioned togethera€!.
It is an open question as to what jobs will be the first to be disrupted by AI; what became obvious
to a bunch of folks this weekend, though, is that there is one universal activity that is under
serious threat: homeworka€!. Who hasna€™ t had to write an essay about a political philosophy, or a
book report, or any number of topics that are, for the student assigned to write said paper
theoretically new, but in terms of the world generally simply a regurgitation of what has been
written a million times before. Now, though, you can write something a€ceoriginala€D from the
regurgitation, and, for at least the next few months, you can do it for free. The obvious analogy
to what ChatGPT means for homework is the calculator: instead of doing tedious math calculations
students could simply punch in the relevant numbers and get the right answer, every time; teachers
adjusted by making students show their work. That there, though, also shows why Ai-generated text
is something completely different; calculators are deterministica€l. AI output, on the other hand,
is probabilistic: ChatGPT doesna€™ t have any internal record of right and wrong, but
rather a statistical model about what bits of language go together under different contextsa€!
On the other hand:
Use of ChatGPT generated text for posts on Stack Overflow is temporarily banneda€l. Because the
average rate of getting correct answers from ChatGPT is too low, the posting of answers created by
ChatGPT is substantially harmful to the site and to users who are asking or looking for correct
answers. The primary problem is that while the answers which ChatGPT produces
have a high rate of being incorrect, they typically look like they might be good and the answers
are very easy to produce. There are also many people trying out ChatGPT to create answers, without
the expertise or willingness to verify that the answer is correct prior to postinga€!
Share Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality
O A^er Things Azt Went Whizzing bya€:
Very Briefly Noted:
• Oren Etzioni: a€~AI refers both to the fundamental scientific quest to build human intelligence
into computers and to the work of modeling massive amounts of data. These two endeavors are very
different, both in their ambitions and in the amount of progress they have madea€! Yes. Exactly.
But AI is also two more things: conversational computers that do not s-ck, and pumping money out of
the pockets of naA~ve VCs.
• Rana Faroohar: a€~Wage inflation? What wage inflation?a€™ ask workers: a€~While inflation in
areas such as food and fuel hits the poor in every country hardest, the comparative decline in real
versus nominal wages has actually been sharpest in the rich worlda€!. It is a bitter irony thata€!
central bankers must now quash inflation, [but] they have no tools to fix whata€™ s truly broken in
labour marketsa€! This is why I worry about those who are so confident that whacking the labor
market will diminish inflation efficiently. It seems to me that, since real wages are falling,
inflation is coming from supply-chain bottlenecks and such. And whacking construction and
tradeables with higher interest rates seems to me likely to be very inefficient at relieving
supply-chain
bottlenecks.
• Claudia Sahm: Burden of proof is on the inflation hawks now: a€~Reality shows a "soft landing"
in 2023 in the United States taking shape. We avoid a recession, we keep the job-full recovery, and
inflation moves back down. Hawks, it's time to join us in realitya€! My reading is that the FOMC
agrees with this: that the pause is likely to start in January.
• Daniel Drezner: Emmanuel Macron is Kinda Sorta Right about Russia: a€~Much as the hard-working
staff here at Dreznera€™ s World wants to mock Macron some more, however, there is the inconvenient
fact that he might have a point. As noted in this space two months ago, NATO needs to communicate
that it does not pose an existential threat to Russia even as the war grinds ona€! But
NATO is an existential threat to Putina€™s rAOgime, in the long run at least. And this is a
problem, especially as Putin continues to misbehave and hence raise NATOa€™s consciousness with
respect how better the world would be if he were simply gone.
• Max Read: Halogencore: a€~Halogencore movies are stories of corporate intrigue and malfeasance,
told from the point of view ofa€! low-level apparatchiks, functionaries, subordinates, and middle
managersa€!. They are stories of beaten-down people acquiescing to or negotiating compromise with
power. The "victory" of a happy ending in a halogencore movie is not that power has been
toppled but that our compromised hero has manage to survivea€! A whole genre that I had not known
existed!
• Ian Millhiser: A Trump judge seized control of ICE, and the Supreme Court will decide whether to
stop him: a€~Judge Drew Tiptona€™ s order in United States v. Texas is completely lawless. Thus
far, the Supreme Court has given him a passa€! I confess I had not expected Republican judges too
think that it was their job to let lawless court orders stand for a while just to gum up the
workings of the Democratic-led executive.
• Michael Slaby: Our Private Public Sphere: a€~What the Twitter upheaval might teach us about
private public goodsa€!. One of the great erosions of public intuitions by neoliberal technocrats
preaching market-based venture-philanthropy doublespeak over the last decade has been the quiet
background disinvestment in the actual public systems and public infrastructures capable of
providing
public goodsa€! A very smart point.
Leave a comment
AJs:
I confess that this has always been my reaction to the FaceBook. I used to think it was just
because I had been too lazy to invest the time to train the FaceBook to offer me the feed that I
would want to see. But Ted makes a very good case that the FaceBook's entire strategy has been to
degrade its feed as much as possible in the interests of profit, while still maintaining its
audience. It worked for a while
because too many people had no place else on the internet they could go to. But now, I hope, the
tipping point has been passed:
Ted Gioia: How Web Platforms Collapse: The Facebook Case Study: a€~But long before these fiascos,
Facebook decided to take control of what I get to see from my family, friends, and other accounts I
follow. In the early days of Facebook, I would simply scroll through my friendsa€™ posts in reverse
chronological ordera€! intuitive and easy to manage, but Facebook
announced one day that it would improve the ordera€!. (They recently allowed for a chronological
option, but it took yearsa€”and a growing sense of desperation at the corporate HQa€”for them to
loosen up their restrictions.) The company claimed they would give me the most interesting stuff
firsta€”but the real story here was that priority on a feed can be monetized. Thata€™ s the
same reason why Google fills up page one of the search results with so much crapa€!. This obsession
with monetizing usersa€™ access to information has hurt Facebook much more than they realize.a€!
Mr. Z. wants to get paid before anything goes viral, and thata€™ s the exact opposite of
Substacka€™ s successful formulaa€!. The speed of the collapse, however, was surprising.
Facebook announced the launch of Bulletin on June 29,2021. Facebook announced the termination of
Bulletin on October 4,2022. Even King Henry VIIIa€™ s wives lasted longer than that. Of course,
Facebook has to let some things bypass the algorithm. They cana€™ t build the whole experience on
promoted posts. So they decided that top priority should go to key life events^.\
Ellie Carina continues absolutely killing it with her "what if Galadriel and Sauron did fall in
love?a€D Rings of Power FanFic epic:
Cf., also:
Ellie Carina: The Trials of Mairon: Chapter 24: The Hundred Year Peacea€\
Kage Baker: The House of the Stag: a€~a€ceNowa€! if you die tomorrow, you will still have seen the
fairest sight of your livesa€!. Free their eyes!a€Da€! She looked on them in horror and looked
white ragea€!. a€oeWhat have you done?a€D a€oeBrought you workmen, as I promised,a€D he said in
that same theatrical tone, meeting her eyes without flinching. She saw amusement
there, and a covert purpose. a€oeWhy, madam, are you displeased? Shall I have them hanged?a€D
a€ceNo!a€D she cried. a€oeYou will have them released at once!a€Da€! a€oeThen I will spare your
livesa€!. But you will slave for me nonetheless, to make fair the rooms in which my lady lives ,a€D
a€oeThey will not slave!a€! If they choose to work, you will pay them in gold, and
then youa€™ 11 let them go!a€Da€l a€oeWife, I will defer to your wishesa€!. For I am your slave in
all things. Should one of them displease you, however, his head shall look down sadly from a
pike.a€D a€oeMay I speak with you alone a moment?a€Da€!
Andor is not a Star Wars story. Andor is a WWII or a post-war Eastern Europe storya€”and it is a
great one:
Popula: What made 'Andor' so good?: a€~What made Andor so great and so relentlessa€! the question
of what it would actually be like to live under, or within, a Galactic Empire, day after day: the
material and moral experienced’’the bureaucracy and logisticsa€! [of] an interplanetary system of
dominationa€!. The character I found most memorable: Syril Karn, Cassian Andor's
shadow double. If Cassian's peril and suffering are there to show us how death-defying rebels are
made, Syril devoutly hopes to answer the counter-question of where all those translucent-skinned,
tight-wound Imperial officers come froma€!. It's good to remember that, in the 1977 Star Wars, what
Luke was originally whining to Uncle Owen abouta€”his single, motivating dreama€”
was his desire to get off Tatooine and go to the Academy. The Imperial Academy, that is. With a
more permissive uncle, or at least one who needed less help on the moisture farm, Luke Sky walker
could have been wearing a black helmet and flight suit, the most gifted killer in a TIE fighter
swarma€!
In what sense is this the same playbook as Andrew Jackson or Louis Bonaparte?:
Claire Berlinski: New Caesars, Hungary Edition: a€~Thirteen ways to destroy a liberal democracya€!.
Rule number one: Rewrite history, deliberately fostering nostalgia for an authoritarian pasta€!.
Heighten ethnic, racial, religious, and class divisionsa€!. Magnify fear of foreigners and
outsidersa€!. Enter Caesara€!. Conflate entertainment and politicsa€!. Create chaosa€!. Destroy
confidence in the idea of objective trutha€!. Humiliate or destroy people who are better fit to be
leadersa€!. Gain control over the mediaa€!. Reward loyalistsa€! Punish the unsubmissive. Use
punitive taxes and spurious lawsuitsa€!. Stack the courtsa€!. Rejigger the constitutional
Clearly, it is time to move. Eric Tarloffa€™ s new novel up to the very top of the pile:
James Fallows: More on the book list: Tarloff and Kaplan: a€~Erik Tarloffa€™ s latest novel, Tell
Me The Truth About Lovett is very gooda€!. Erika€™ s books combine hold-your-attention plotting,
with elegant and droll dialogue and description, with insider awareness of their respective
settingsa€!. This onea€l set in the arts world of San Franciscoa€! is a comedy-of-manners
about the world of philanthropy, and the endless dance between the people who must ask for money
and those who decide whether to give. From Evelyn Waugh onward, the Brits have been world champions
in mercilessly hilarious depictions of this sort of relations-among-unequals. Erik has a
Brit-worthy touch. The book is also about gender politics of all sorts, about parents and
children, about love and loss. Ita€™ s quite risquA©. I enjoyed ita€!
Give a gift subscription
Get 50% off a group subscription
Donate Subscriptions
Read Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android
Get the app
Leave a comment
Subscribe now
Read Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android
Get the app
Leave a comment
Subscribe now