Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mTLS auth as an alternative to API Key auth #151

Open
deepakprabhakara opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

mTLS auth as an alternative to API Key auth #151

deepakprabhakara opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@deepakprabhakara
Copy link
Member

deepakprabhakara commented Apr 27, 2022

Is your proposal related to a problem?

We should support mTLS as an auth mechanism for API calls.

Additional context

mTLS ensures that the parties at each end of a network connection are who they claim to be by verifying that they both have the correct private key. The information within their respective TLS certificates provides additional verification.

Further details

We currently use API keys to authenticate protected requests. We need to offer mTLS as an alternative auth mechanism, this will allow our customers to set up internal communication between their services and Jackson.

If possible both auth mechanisms should work (shouldn't be a choice between mTLS or API Keys).

@deepakprabhakara deepakprabhakara added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 27, 2022
@shevalda
Copy link

shevalda commented Oct 2, 2022

Hi, is there any elaboration and detail about this enhancement? I am interested to help with this. Thank you in advance!

@deepakprabhakara
Copy link
Member Author

That's great @shevalda, here's a Cloudflare article with more details - https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/access-management/what-is-mutual-tls/. We want to support mTLS auth in addition to the API key based auth we currently support.

@deepakprabhakara
Copy link
Member Author

@gitstart-boxyhq One more issue is ready, many thanks

@sp6370
Copy link

sp6370 commented Oct 24, 2023

Hi @deepakprabhakara!

I would like to pick this up. Could you assign me the issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants