Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Integrate Mangrove Review Standard #3298

Open
CMiksche opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Enhancement] Integrate Mangrove Review Standard #3298

CMiksche opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@CMiksche
Copy link

CMiksche commented Feb 28, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently this project is based on ActivityPub, however ActivityPub wasn't designed to be a review standard.

For a better way to share the Review data I would suggest that a decentralised review standard should be implemented additionally.

Describe the solution you'd like
The Mangrove Review Standard was designed as a decentralised review standard and supports books, urls, restaurants and more. See https://mangrove.reviews/standard for the Specification.

Mangrove is designed by a non-profit, the Open Reviews Association and is also basically decentralized - meaning every BookWyrm Instance could also be a Mangrove instance.

Additionally BookWyrm could benefit from other applications where users rate the books and the other way around other apps would benefit from BookWyrm reviews - so we would help creating a better decentralised ecosystem for reviews.

Additional context
To give a example, let's say I create a App which lets users see Reviews of books. With the Mangrove Review Standard I could easily integrate multiple sources of the Reviews, if I just rely on ActivityPub I guess that every Instance has a slightly different definition of how a book looks like as a ActivityPub Object?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant