Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It would be nice to have a Top operator that would merge OrderBy and Take #103

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 3, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

This same argument for Max and Min could be applied to this operator. The main 
benefit would be performance, but I think it actually might be more readable. 
Without the requirement of sorting the entire list, you move from an average 
case of O(n log n)for an optimal sorting algorithm to O(n) for an optimal 
selection algorithm.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Pope...@gmail.com on 27 May 2015 at 9:49

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This issue has been migrated to:
https://github.com/MoreLINQ/morelinq/issues/103
The conversation continues there.
DO NOT post any further comments to the issue tracker on Google Code as it is 
shutting down.
You can also just subscribe to the issue on GitHub to receive notifications of 
any further development.

Original comment by azizatif on 21 Aug 2015 at 6:56

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant