Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to Not Print "Not Reflected" Reports of Paramminer on Output.ndjson #1330

Open
TheTechromancer opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 Discussed in #1329 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@TheTechromancer
Copy link
Collaborator

Discussed in #1329

Originally posted by amiremami April 29, 2024
That would be great if possible to add a config option for paramminer to not print not reflected items into output.ndjson

image

Thanks 馃檹

@TheTechromancer TheTechromancer added this to the BBOT 2.01 milestone Apr 29, 2024
@TheTechromancer TheTechromancer added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 29, 2024
@liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator

I think i'd rather have the generic ability to filter by tags in the output module, rather than something specific just for this one tag in paramminer. @TheTechromancer thoughts?

@TheTechromancer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TheTechromancer commented May 4, 2024

Tags are a good idea but we should try and consider users who are only scanning for vulnerabilities and don't plan on doing manual fuzzing. To them I think only the reflected ones would be interesting, so it might make sense to have a filter option on the module.

On the other hand, even the reflected ones sometimes don't result in a vulnerability. So until we have a more complete web scanning family with PARAM events, if we just want to say the paramminer modules are for advanced users only, that's fine too.

@liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator

Lightfuzz branch will change how all of these works, so I am very hesitant to make changes like this now (there will be an entirely new event type, WEB_PARAMETER). This is also why I was leaning towards making a generic option to filter by tags.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants