Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

馃悰 <TITLE> Biome JetBrains IDE plugin suggests lint fixes, despite having disabled the linter in biome.json #51

Open
1 task done
anthony-hayes opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

馃悰 <TITLE> Biome JetBrains IDE plugin suggests lint fixes, despite having disabled the linter in biome.json #51

anthony-hayes opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@anthony-hayes
Copy link

Environment information

IDE plugin 1.0.2 (GoLand 24.1) https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/22761-biome/versions

What happened?

I'm using Biome as a formatter only, and would like it to respect the biome.json. However, in my editor, I'm getting lint suggestions, despite that not being something I configured.

Expected result

The IDE plugin should respect the biome.json

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow Biome's Code of Conduct
@anthony-hayes anthony-hayes changed the title 馃悰 <TITLE> BIome JetBrains IDE plugin suggests lint fixes, despite having disabled the linter 馃悰 <TITLE> BIome JetBrains IDE plugin suggests lint fixes, despite having disabled the linter in biome.json Apr 17, 2024
@anthony-hayes anthony-hayes changed the title 馃悰 <TITLE> BIome JetBrains IDE plugin suggests lint fixes, despite having disabled the linter in biome.json 馃悰 <TITLE> Biome JetBrains IDE plugin suggests lint fixes, despite having disabled the linter in biome.json Apr 17, 2024
@ematipico ematipico transferred this issue from biomejs/biome Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@anthony-hayes