Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Highlight acceleration/decelleration trend #5

Open
SachaG opened this issue Dec 28, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Highlight acceleration/decelleration trend #5

SachaG opened this issue Dec 28, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@SachaG
Copy link
Contributor

SachaG commented Dec 28, 2017

I know there’s the 2016 version, but I mean being able to compare in the same place if the project is accelerating or decelerating

For example Feathers went from +4.1k stars in 2016 to +2.9k in 2017, so it would seem to indicate that it’s losing speed while of course other projects are growing faster and faster. That could be interesting to highlight somehow.

For example instead of grey bars, we could have green bars when it’s a positive trend and red bars when it’s negative and show the increase on hover maybe, or next to the number of stars

@michaelrambeau
Copy link
Member

When there was a graph for each category, I thought about using 2 bars by project:

  • the upper bar could be the number of stars added in 2017
  • the lower bar, in a lighter color, could be the number of stars added in 2016

Maybe there could be a button to toggle the view, for each category:

  • Table view: the table we display currently
  • Graph View: the bar graph, with 2016 and 2017 data

What do you think, does it make sense?

@SachaG
Copy link
Contributor Author

SachaG commented Dec 28, 2017

To me having multiple views sounds a little too complex, and it requires a lot of going back and forth for the user. I think having all the data on a single view would be better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants