Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Authorize.Net optional fields are not optional #181

Open
ghost opened this issue Sep 27, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Authorize.Net optional fields are not optional #181

ghost opened this issue Sep 27, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 27, 2018

Documentation labels the opts as optional but if you try to submit without them you get an error.

iex> amount = Money.new(20, :USD)
iex> card = %CreditCard{number: "5424000000000015", year: 2099, month: 12, verification_code: "999"}
iex> result = Gringotts.purchase(Gringotts.Gateways.AuthorizeNet, amount, card, [])

{:error,
 %{
   __struct__: Gringotts.Response,
   authorization: nil,
   avs_result: nil,
   cvc_result: nil,
   error_code: nil,
   fraud_review: nil,
   message: nil,
   params: nil,
   raw: %{
     "ErrorResponse" => %{
       "messages" => %{
         "message" => %{
           "code" => "E00003",
           "text" => "The 'AnetApi/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd:itemId' element is invalid - The value '' is invalid according to its datatype 'String' - The actual length is less than the MinLength value." 
         },
         "resultCode" => "Error"
       }
     }
   },
   status_code: nil,
   success: false
 }}

When I look at the payload in Gateways.AuthorizeNet.commit/3 it looks like the opts are included as blanks anyway. I believe this is throwing a bug on Authorize.Net's end where when they see the "lineItems" node they expect a "lineItem" with a "itemId" with length greater than 0.

pry(2)> XmlToMap.naive_map(payload)
%{
  "createTransactionRequest" => %{
    "merchantAuthentication" => %{
      "name" => "6X3g9dVnZ",
      "transactionKey" => "8eP2Jc7SA7a3h3Gy"
    },
    "refId" => %{},
    "transactionRequest" => %{
      "amount" => "5",
      "billTo" => %{
        "address" => %{},
        "city" => %{},
        "company" => %{},
        "country" => %{},
        "firstName" => %{},
        "lastName" => %{},
        "state" => %{},
        "zip" => %{}
      },
      "customer" => %{"id" => %{}},
      "customerIP" => %{},
      "duty" => %{"amount" => "0", "description" => %{}, "name" => %{}},
      "lineItems" => %{
        "lineItem" => %{
          "description" => %{},
          "itemId" => %{},
          "name" => %{},
          "quantity" => %{},
          "unitPrice" => %{}
        }
      },
      "order" => %{"description" => %{}, "invoiceNumber" => %{}},
      "payment" => %{
        "creditCard" => %{
          "cardCode" => "999",
          "cardNumber" => "5424000000000015",
          "expirationDate" => "2020-12"
        }
      },
      "poNumber" => %{},
      "shipTo" => %{
        "address" => %{},
        "city" => %{},
        "company" => %{},
        "country" => %{},
        "firstName" => %{},
        "lastName" => %{},
        "state" => %{},
        "zip" => %{}
      },
      "shipping" => %{"amount" => "0", "description" => %{}, "name" => %{}},
      "tax" => %{"amount" => "0", "description" => %{}, "name" => %{}},
      "transactionType" => "authOnlyTransaction"
    }
  }
}

I tested this structure:

<createTransactionRequest xmlns="AnetApi/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd">
  <merchantAuthentication>
    <name>78BZ5Xprry</name>
    <transactionKey>8s2F95Q7brhHd7Tn</transactionKey>
  </merchantAuthentication>
  <transactionRequest>
    <transactionType>authCaptureTransaction</transactionType>
    <amount>5</amount>
    <payment>
      <creditCard>
        <cardNumber>5424000000000015</cardNumber>
        <expirationDate>2020-12</expirationDate>
        <cardCode>999</cardCode>
      </creditCard>
    </payment>
    <order>
     <invoiceNumber>INV-12345</invoiceNumber>
     <description>Product Description</description>
    </order>
  </transactionRequest>
</createTransactionRequest>

on Authorize.Net's API reference and I got a successful response, so it doesn't seem necessary to include all the blank options in the request if there happen to be no options included. May I suggest only submitting opts that the user submits in the call to Gringotts.purchase as a solution to this problem?

@arjun289
Copy link
Member

arjun289 commented Sep 28, 2018

@cmititiuc Looking into this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant