Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Planned for 0.10.0: Drop official support for Elm 0.17,0.18 #787

Open
avh4 opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Planned for 0.10.0: Drop official support for Elm 0.17,0.18 #787

avh4 opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
discussion full operators list Features that require knowledge of the complete list of defined operators
Milestone
0.10.0

Comments

@avh4
Copy link
Owner

avh4 commented Feb 11, 2023 •
edited

Version 0.10.0 (and possible starting in the 0.9.* experimental series), only Elm 0.19 will be supported. This will help simplify upgrading the parser (which should give some huge performance improvements).

Folks who are still using Elm 0.18 can stick with elm-format 0.8.*.
@avh4 avh4 added this to the 0.10.0 milestone Feb 11, 2023
@avh4 avh4 mentioned this issue Mar 15, 2023
Open
2 tasks
@avh4 avh4 pinned this issue Mar 15, 2023
@avh4 avh4 added the full operators list Features that require knowledge of the complete list of defined operators label Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussion full operators list Features that require knowledge of the complete list of defined operators
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.10.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@avh4