Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debate on the choice of the name "run_args" #86

Open
Tracked by #65
danrgll opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #65

Debate on the choice of the name "run_args" #86

danrgll opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested
Milestone

Comments

@danrgll
Copy link
Collaborator

danrgll commented May 3, 2024

I feel like this naming caused confusion before in the lectures. Would it be possible to explicitly call the argument as setup_config_path: Path | str?
I debated whether to call it something like setup_yaml_path but I figure we don't want to lock ourselves into saying yaml. --Eddie, on PR #61

@danrgll danrgll added the question Further information is requested label May 3, 2024
@danrgll danrgll mentioned this issue May 3, 2024
12 tasks
@eddiebergman eddiebergman added this to the Declaritive milestone May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants