Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Consider supporting multiple AsyncAPI Docs as config source. #46

Open
smoya opened this issue Sep 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Consider supporting multiple AsyncAPI Docs as config source. #46

smoya opened this issue Sep 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request keep-open keep-open

Comments

@smoya
Copy link
Collaborator

smoya commented Sep 22, 2021

Just to add some context, the app configures the Kafka proxy based on the servers section and some properties (actually extensions) you must configure on the server(s).
Just to simplify, It basically configures a local port to map to a remote Kafka broker.

The question is: What are the usecase for supporting multiple AsyncAPI files?

As example, I could think there might be use cases where users might want to configure the app to act as Kafka proxy for several Kafka clusters. Clusters that could be found in different asyncapi.yaml files.
However, I see some technical complexity in here, since same servers could be declared in several files but with different names, same for channels related to those servers.

Is there a concise reason we might want to support configuring the event-gateway from several files instead of just using one?

cc @fmvilas @derberg

@smoya smoya self-assigned this Sep 27, 2021
@smoya smoya changed the title Support multiple AsyncAPI Docs and simplify configuration Consider supporting multiple AsyncAPI Docs as config source. Sep 27, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 26, 2022
@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Collaborator

I think that it's still relevant :)

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu added enhancement New feature or request and removed stale labels Jan 26, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label May 27, 2022
@smoya smoya added keep-open keep-open and removed stale labels Jun 10, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request keep-open keep-open
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants