-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hide or punish records with missing abstracts #326
Comments
@PeterLombaers / @J535D165 @terrymyc would this technically be possible? |
I guess technically it would be similar to skipping a record? Then you could do #328 at the same time. |
Technically it is easy to implement. |
We don't think this should be stored in the settings menu, because settings are stored in the browser. Therefore, this results in reproducibility issues. Alternative would be a different query strategy (one that moves the records with missing abstracts to the end of the queue). Model changing options in the future can serve as this setting. I will leave this issue open and add a help-wanted tag to it (to create this query strategy). I will remove the v1 milestone. |
I like the idea of developing a new model for this purpose! Would be an excellent First contribution! |
In the current version, if a case has a missing abstract, only the title is displayed plus a DOI if available. Could we make it an option in the settings menu whether or not to use/show cases with missing abstracts? Default should be to use/show.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: