Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving Abstract Review Efficiency #1688

Open
Bmcoimbra opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Improving Abstract Review Efficiency #1688

Bmcoimbra opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Bmcoimbra
Copy link

Dear colleagues,

I found myself pondering the other day as I delve into a systematic review of prospective studies on stress disorders. While ASReview undoubtedly streamlines the entire process, I still find myself sifting through numerous abstracts of studies with ineligible methodological designs. Is it perhaps feasible to incorporate features that allow for the highlighting of specific words in the abstracts to expedite the process? For instance, if I'm conducting a review of prospective studies, the ability to highlight terms like "cross-sectional" and "retrospective" would greatly aid in swiftly discerning and discarding irrelevant papers. Keep up the great work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants