Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Add step back feature (redux) #75

Closed
hydrargyrum opened this issue Apr 7, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Feature request: Add step back feature (redux) #75

hydrargyrum opened this issue Apr 7, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@hydrargyrum
Copy link

hydrargyrum commented Apr 7, 2020

I am conscious this feature has been requested multiple times but everytime it was closed without being addressed properly (for example asciinema/asciinema#278, asciinema/asciinema#133).

I understand stepping back is not as efficient as stepping forward, but couldn't it simply be implemented by replaying the beginning of the file until the desired frame, without timings (like asciinema cat)?

For example, head -50 /path/to/asciinema.recording | asciinema cat -, plays the first 49 frames of the recording. Seeking to previous frame would be as simple as running (the equivalent of) head -49 /path/to/asciinema.recording | asciinema cat -. Seeking to a specific time can be done the same way because we have timing info for each frame.

@hydrargyrum hydrargyrum changed the title Feature request: Add step back feature Feature request: Add step back feature (redux) Apr 7, 2020
@hydrargyrum
Copy link
Author

I just realized that feature is in the web player, but not in the CLI player. Why not implementing it the same way?

@ku1ik ku1ik transferred this issue from asciinema/asciinema Apr 25, 2023
@asciinema asciinema locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 25, 2023
@ku1ik ku1ik converted this issue into discussion #76 Apr 25, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant