Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAILED: SWIMActorClusteredTests.test_swim_shouldPingSpecificMemberWhenRequested #1145

Open
yim-lee opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
failed 💥 Failed tickets are CI or benchmarking failures, should be investigated as soon as possible

Comments

@yim-lee
Copy link
Member

yim-lee commented Nov 10, 2023

https://ci.swiftserver.group/job/swift-distributed-actors-5.9-prb/34/consoleFull

11:42:41 /code/Tests/DistributedClusterTests/Cluster/SWIM/SWIMActorClusteredTests.swift:218: error: SWIMActorClusteredTests.test_swim_shouldPingSpecificMemberWhenRequested : failed - Expected ack, but got nack(target: SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim), sequenceNumber: 13)
11:42:41 <EXPR>:0: error: SWIMActorClusteredTests.test_swim_shouldPingSpecificMemberWhenRequested : threw error "
11:42:41             throw testKit(firstNode).fail("Expected ack, but got \(response)")
11:42:41                                     ^~~~~
11:42:41 error: Expected ack, but got nack(target: SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim), sequenceNumber: 13)"
11:42:41 ------------------------------------- ClusterSystem(first, sact://first@127.0.0.1:9001) ------------------------------------------------
11:42:41 ========================================================================================================================
11:42:41 ------------------------------------- ClusterSystem(second, sact://second@127.0.0.1:9002) ------------------------------------------------
11:42:41 [captured] [second] 19:42:41.2000 trace [/user/swim] [SWIMActor.swift:477] Received pingRequest@13 [SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim)] from [SWIMActor(sact://first@127.0.0.1:9001/user/swim)]
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/incarnation": 0
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/members/all": 
11:42:41 [captured] [second] //   SWIM.Member(SWIMActor(/user/swim), alive(incarnation: 0), protocolPeriod: 0)
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/members/count": 1
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/pingRequest/origin": SWIMActor(sact://first@127.0.0.1:9001/user/swim)
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/pingRequest/payload": none
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/pingRequest/seqNr": 13
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/protocolPeriod": 1
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/suspects/count": 0
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/timeoutSuspectsBeforePeriodMax": 2
11:42:41 [captured] [second] // "swim/timeoutSuspectsBeforePeriodMin": 1
11:42:41 [captured] [second] 19:42:41.2010 debug [/user/swim] [SWIMActor.swift:136] Sending ping
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/gossip/payload": membership([SWIM.Member(SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim), alive(incarnation: 0), protocolPeriod: 1), SWIM.Member(SWIMActor(/user/swim), alive(incarnation: 0), protocolPeriod: 0)])
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/incarnation": 0
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/members/all": 
11:43:01 [captured] [second] //   SWIM.Member(SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim), alive(incarnation: 0), protocolPeriod: 1)
11:43:01 [captured] [second] //   SWIM.Member(SWIMActor(/user/swim), alive(incarnation: 0), protocolPeriod: 0)
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/members/count": 2
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/protocolPeriod": 1
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/suspects/count": 0
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/target": SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim)
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/timeout": 0.24 seconds
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/timeoutSuspectsBeforePeriodMax": 2
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/timeoutSuspectsBeforePeriodMin": 1
11:43:01 [captured] [second] 19:42:41.4430 debug [/user/swim] [SWIMActor.swift:154] .ping resulted in error
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "error": RemoteCallError(timedOut(74357AB2-53F8-48E2-A9B1-E5FED362B9BE, DistributedCluster.TimeoutError(message: "Remote call [74357AB2-53F8-48E2-A9B1-E5FED362B9BE] to [DistributedCluster.SWIMActor.ping(origin:payload:sequenceNumber:)](sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim) timed out", timeout: 0.24 seconds)), at: DistributedCluster/ClusterSystem.swift:1291)
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/incarnation": 0
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/members/all": 
11:43:01 [captured] [second] //   SWIM.Member(SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim), alive(incarnation: 0), protocolPeriod: 1)
11:43:01 [captured] [second] //   SWIM.Member(SWIMActor(/user/swim), alive(incarnation: 0), protocolPeriod: 0)
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/members/count": 2
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/ping/sequenceNumber": 1
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/ping/target": SWIMActor(sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003/user/swim)
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/protocolPeriod": 1
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/suspects/count": 0
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/timeoutSuspectsBeforePeriodMax": 2
11:43:01 [captured] [second] // "swim/timeoutSuspectsBeforePeriodMin": 1
11:43:01 ========================================================================================================================
11:43:01 ------------------------------------- ClusterSystem(third, sact://third@127.0.0.1:9003) ------------------------------------------------
11:43:01 ========================================================================================================================
11:43:01 Test Case 'SWIMActorClusteredTests.test_swim_shouldPingSpecificMemberWhenRequested' failed (0.291 seconds)
@yim-lee yim-lee added the failed 💥 Failed tickets are CI or benchmarking failures, should be investigated as soon as possible label Nov 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
failed 💥 Failed tickets are CI or benchmarking failures, should be investigated as soon as possible
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant