You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current behaviour when deleting a SeataServer CR is to preserve the volume claimed by associated Statefulset. It would be nice to add an option for user to control the volumn recalim behaviour.
My idea is to add a new volumeReclaimPolicy property inside store structure, and make valid values ("Delete", "Retain"). "Retain" stands for current implementation, whereas "Delete" stands for delete associated volumns when deleting the SeataServer CR. It is recommended to use Kubernetes finalizer to implement the "Delete" policy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current behaviour when deleting a SeataServer CR is to preserve the volume claimed by associated Statefulset. It would be nice to add an option for user to control the volumn recalim behaviour.
My idea is to add a new
volumeReclaimPolicy
property insidestore
structure, and make valid values ("Delete", "Retain"). "Retain" stands for current implementation, whereas "Delete" stands for delete associated volumns when deleting the SeataServer CR. It is recommended to use Kubernetes finalizer to implement the "Delete" policy.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: