Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Shuffle] Support cache remote shuffle reader client in executor. #736

Open
Ted-Jiang opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Ted-Jiang
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
(This section helps Arrow developers understand the context and why for this feature, in addition to the what)

In our env, when executor grows to 100+, when running sql (shuffle 100G) with 10 parallel. Got

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Query with job id wXHGdKf failed due to Job failed due to stage 3 failed: Task failed due to runtime execution error: DataFusionError(ArrowError(ExternalError("Arrow error: External error: Shuffle fetch partition error from Executor 10.69.147.148 : 7115d88d-1212-4a4d-95b7-58f5a68600be, map_stage 2, map_partition 3, error desc: Error connecting to Ballista scheduler or executor at http://10.69.147.148:50051/: tonic::transport::Error(Transport, hyper::Error(Connect, Custom { kind: TimedOut, error: Elapsed(()) })) @ GrpcConnectionError")))

Seems cache the client is a solution, All cut-edge systems like iox and tikv did this.
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@Ted-Jiang Ted-Jiang added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant