You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are three categories for standard oracle SQL functions (not java): string functions, numeric functions and other functions. I think that some functions are misplaced into string functions. Like for example NVL.
Lots of function keywords are not categorized at all.
My question is: Would it be a good idea to redo the parser function categorization and use Oracle's own categorization as much as possible. It can be found at this URL: https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/sqlrf/Single-Row-Functions.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
AndersRongbyIMI
changed the title
SQL functions misplaced in parser definition?
[PL/SQL] SQL functions misplaced in parser definition?
May 2, 2024
There are three categories for standard oracle SQL functions (not java): string functions, numeric functions and other functions. I think that some functions are misplaced into string functions. Like for example NVL.
Lots of function keywords are not categorized at all.
My question is: Would it be a good idea to redo the parser function categorization and use Oracle's own categorization as much as possible. It can be found at this URL: https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/sqlrf/Single-Row-Functions.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: