You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For large disc collections (in my particular case, a classical box set with 13 discs), disc numbers are sorted as strings instead of integers. This results in a disc ordering of 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 2, 3, ...
Presumably this is a simple change, as track numbers do not have this problem. I would try to make the change myself if I knew where to apply it; at a glance it isn't clear. Using version 0.4.6-4eacc22.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's not a great solution for those of us who tag our entire libraries with an automated tool like MusicBrainz Picard. Every time I refresh tags with the latest MusicBrainz database I'll have to go relabel the discs.
For large disc collections (in my particular case, a classical box set with 13 discs), disc numbers are sorted as strings instead of integers. This results in a disc ordering of
1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 2, 3, ...
Presumably this is a simple change, as track numbers do not have this problem. I would try to make the change myself if I knew where to apply it; at a glance it isn't clear. Using version 0.4.6-4eacc22.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: