Version of polylux2pdfpc

[diogotcorreia]

Hey!

I'm packaging polylux2pdfpc but we're not sure about what version to apply to this package.
NixOS/nixpkgs#280525

Would it be possible to do one of the following?

• Match the version in Cargo.toml with the one from polylux itself
• Tag it with its own tags (e.g., polylux2pdfpc-v0.1.0)
• Some other solution you think it's preferable

Regardless of which solution you choose, I'd appreciate if you could make a new release, so that I could use that tag in the package.

Thanks a lot for the great work, just used polylux in a presentation today and it worked flawlessly!

[andreasKroepelin]

I'm not sure I understand your request. Could you try explaining it further?

Also, are you aware of the Nix packaging of polylux2pdfpc that @drupol did?

[diogotcorreia]

@andreasKroepelin

Hey, thanks for the reply!
The problem here is that the version in Cargo.toml is 0.1.0, while the version of the parent project is 0.3.1:

polylux/pdfpc-extractor/Cargo.toml

Line 5 in 721cd47

version = "0.1.0"

Therefore, it makes it seem like the versions are not in sync. I think the easiest way would be to just bump it up to the same version (i.e., 0.3.2; please make a new release, so I can use the new tag in the package), or, alternatively, just make a different tag for it and keep them unsynchronized.
Relevant discussion downstream: NixOS/nixpkgs#280525 (comment)

I was not aware of that PR adding a nix flake, no, but it is possible to have both the packaging as a flake here and as a package in nixpkgs.

Let me know your thoughts on this.

[andreasKroepelin]

Okay, got it. And I'm not really knowledgable regarding Nix, so sorry for my ignorance 😅

I will then make the version of polylux2pdfpc be synced with Polylux. Thanks for the explanation and I'm glad you enjoyed using Polylux!

[diogotcorreia]

No problem! Nix really is a journey of its own :)

Thanks again!