If a pinned note is selected and included in the merge, the result is always a pinned note!

[AI-IMED]

I see that the correct way is that the result of the merge depends on the first note in the sequential selection. If the first note in the sequential selection is (pinned) the result will be a pinned note, and if the first note in the sequential selection is (Unpinned), the result will be Unpinned note

[alialbaali]

The thing here is that, merging is sequential. For example, let's say that the user wants to merge the unpinned note first with a pinned note. In the current implementation, it would result in a pinned note. However, in your implementation, it would result in an unpinned note.

[AI-IMED]

However, in your implementation, it would result in an unpinned note

Don't you think that makes sense for the time being, instead of consideration all the notes resulting from the merge as (pinned) as it is happening now

[alialbaali]

I think it is a flaw in the implementation, if it's done like that. I'm leaving this open, so we can get more opinions.